Military Decision Making Process (MDMP) Practice Exam 2026 - Free MDMP Practice Questions and Study Guide

For effective Course of Action (COA) comparison, establishing clear criteria for evaluation is fundamental. This clarity allows decision-makers to systematically assess each COA against specific standards, ensuring that comparisons are objective and focused on relevant factors such as feasibility, acceptability, suitability, and completeness.

When criteria are well-defined, stakeholders can evaluate the potential outcomes and risks associated with each COA objectively, facilitating a more informed decision process. It helps to eliminate ambiguity and provides a framework for discussion and analysis, making it easier to distinguish between the advantages and disadvantages of each option.

While having access to previous mission data may provide valuable insights and contextual background, it does not necessarily provide a basis for evaluating new options. Similarly, the availability of senior leadership and comprehensive logistic plans may support the overall planning process but do not directly influence the comparison of COAs themselves. Effective comparison hinges on having clear, standardized benchmarks against which to weigh the different COAs.